Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit fd6bc9a6 authored by Myron Stowe's avatar Myron Stowe
Browse files

PCI: Restore original INTX_DISABLE bit by pcim_intx()

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-83611
Upstream Status: d555ed45a5a10a813528c7685f432369d536ae3d

commit d555ed45a5a10a813528c7685f432369d536ae3d
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Thu Oct 31 14:42:56 2024 +0100

    PCI: Restore original INTX_DISABLE bit by pcim_intx()

    pcim_intx() tries to restore the INTx bit at removal via devres, but there
    is a chance that it restores a wrong value.

    Because the value to be restored is blindly assumed to be the negative of
    the enable argument, when a driver calls pcim_intx() unnecessarily for the
    already enabled state, it'll restore to the disabled state in turn.  That
    is, the function assumes the case like:

      // INTx == 1
      pcim_intx(pdev, 0); // old INTx value assumed to be 1 -> correct

    but it might be like the following, too:

      // INTx == 0
      pcim_intx(pdev, 0); // old INTx value assumed to be 1 -> wrong

    Also, when a driver calls pcim_intx() multiple times with different enable
    argument values, the last one will win no matter what value it is.  This
    can lead to inconsistency, e.g.

      // INTx == 1
      pcim_intx(pdev, 0); // OK
      ...
      pcim_intx(pdev, 1); // now old INTx wrongly assumed to be 0

    This patch addresses those inconsistencies by saving the original INTx
    state at the first pcim_intx() call.  For that, get_or_create_intx_devres()
    is folded into pcim_intx() caller side; it allows us to simply check the
    already allocated devres and record the original INTx along with the
    devres_alloc() call.

    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241031134300.10296-1-tiwai@suse.de
    Fixes: 25216afc ("PCI: Add managed pcim_intx()")
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/87v7xk2ps5.wl-tiwai@suse.de


Signed-off-by: default avatarTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPhilipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
    Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org      # v6.11+

Signed-off-by: default avatarMyron Stowe <mstowe@redhat.com>
parent 9a9025dd
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -419,19 +419,12 @@ static void pcim_intx_restore(struct device *dev, void *data) ...@@ -419,19 +419,12 @@ static void pcim_intx_restore(struct device *dev, void *data)
pci_intx(pdev, res->orig_intx); pci_intx(pdev, res->orig_intx);
} }
static struct pcim_intx_devres *get_or_create_intx_devres(struct device *dev) static void save_orig_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pcim_intx_devres *res)
{ {
struct pcim_intx_devres *res; u16 pci_command;
res = devres_find(dev, pcim_intx_restore, NULL, NULL);
if (res)
return res;
res = devres_alloc(pcim_intx_restore, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL); pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &pci_command);
if (res) res->orig_intx = !(pci_command & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE);
devres_add(dev, res);
return res;
} }
/** /**
...@@ -447,12 +440,23 @@ static struct pcim_intx_devres *get_or_create_intx_devres(struct device *dev) ...@@ -447,12 +440,23 @@ static struct pcim_intx_devres *get_or_create_intx_devres(struct device *dev)
int pcim_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, int enable) int pcim_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, int enable)
{ {
struct pcim_intx_devres *res; struct pcim_intx_devres *res;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
res = get_or_create_intx_devres(&pdev->dev); /*
if (!res) * pcim_intx() must only restore the INTx value that existed before the
return -ENOMEM; * driver was loaded, i.e., before it called pcim_intx() for the
* first time.
*/
res = devres_find(dev, pcim_intx_restore, NULL, NULL);
if (!res) {
res = devres_alloc(pcim_intx_restore, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!res)
return -ENOMEM;
save_orig_intx(pdev, res);
devres_add(dev, res);
}
res->orig_intx = !enable;
pci_intx(pdev, enable); pci_intx(pdev, enable);
return 0; return 0;
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment