Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
M
mesa
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
staging
src-rhel
rpms
mesa
Commits
c8b02071
Commit
c8b02071
authored
1 year ago
by
importbot
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
import mesa-24.0.0-1.el10
parent
7edf9e9f
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
3
Expand all
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
SOURCES/Mesa-MLAA-License-Clarification-Email.txt
+117
-0
117 additions, 0 deletions
SOURCES/Mesa-MLAA-License-Clarification-Email.txt
SOURCES/gnome-shell-glthread-disable.patch
+11
-0
11 additions, 0 deletions
SOURCES/gnome-shell-glthread-disable.patch
SPECS/mesa.spec
+715
-0
715 additions, 0 deletions
SPECS/mesa.spec
with
843 additions
and
0 deletions
SOURCES/Mesa-MLAA-License-Clarification-Email.txt
0 → 100644
+
117
−
0
View file @
c8b02071
Subject: RE: Question about Mesa MLAA license
From: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
Date: 01/08/2013 12:50 PM
To: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
CC: "jorge@iryoku.com" <jorge@iryoku.com>
Yes to both questions.
Thanks,
Jorge
From: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
Sent: January 8, 2013 6:49 PM
To: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
CC: jorge@iryoku.com
Subject: Re: Question about Mesa MLAA license
On 01/08/2013 12:39 PM, Jorge Jimenez wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> What we meant with that is that we made an exception for clause 2.
> Instead of clause 2, in the case of the Mesa project, you have to name
> the technique Jimenez's MLAA in the config options of Mesa. We did that
> just to allow them to solve license issues. This exception should be for
> the Mesa project, and any project using Mesa, like Fedora.
>
> We want to widespread usage of our MLAA, so we want to avoid any kind of
> license complications. Hope current one is good for Fedora, if not
> please tell, and we'll see what we can do!
Okay, a few more questions:
* If Fedora decides to simply reproduce the quoted statement:
"Uses Jimenez's MLAA. Copyright (C) 2010 by Jorge Jimenez, Belen Masia,
Jose I. Echevarria, Fernando Navarro and Diego Gutierrez."
Specifically, if this is done as part of documentation included with
Mesa, is that sufficient to meet clause 2 even if the Mesa config option
is not set as described in your exception?
* Currently, the Mesa config option for MLAA says: "Morphological
anti-aliasing based on Jimenez\' MLAA. 0 to disable, 8 for default
quality". Is this in compliance with your exception?
Thanks again,
~tom
==
Fedora Project
Subject: RE: Question about Mesa MLAA license
From: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
Date: 01/08/2013 12:39 PM
To: "jorge@iryoku.com" <jorge@iryoku.com>, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
Hi Tom,
What we meant with that is that we made an exception for clause 2.
Instead of clause 2, in the case of the Mesa project, you have to name
the technique Jimenez's MLAA in the config options of Mesa. We did that
just to allow them to solve license issues. This exception should be for
the Mesa project, and any project using Mesa, like Fedora.
We want to widespread usage of our MLAA, so we want to avoid any kind of
license complications. Hope current one is good for Fedora, if not
please tell, and we'll see what we can do!
Cheers,
Jorge
From: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
Sent: January 8, 2013 6:30 PM
To: jorge@iryoku.com
Subject: Question about Mesa MLAA license
Jorge,
Thanks for all of your fantastic graphics work! I have been auditing
Fedora (a popular distribution of Linux) for license compliance and I
came across your MLAA code in Mesa.
The license says:
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the following
statement:
*
* "Uses Jimenez's MLAA. Copyright (C) 2010 by Jorge Jimenez, Belen Masia,
* Jose I. Echevarria, Fernando Navarro and Diego Gutierrez."
*
* Only for use in the Mesa project, this point 2 is filled by naming the
* technique Jimenez's MLAA in the Mesa config options.
That wording is unclear. When you say "Only for use in the Mesa
project...", it seems like you could either be saying:
- This code may only be used as part of Mesa.
OR
- In Mesa, you can comply with clause 2 by simply selecting "Jimenez's
MLAA" in the Mesa config options.
*****
If the first item is true, then we may have to remove the MLAA code from
Fedora's copy of Mesa. However, looking at the license on your SMAA
code, I do not believe it to be the case. Please let me know either way!
Thanks in advance,
Tom Callaway
Fedora Legal
==
Fedora Project
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
SOURCES/gnome-shell-glthread-disable.patch
0 → 100644
+
11
−
0
View file @
c8b02071
diff -up mesa-22.3.0-rc4/src/util/00-mesa-defaults.conf.dma mesa-22.3.0-rc4/src/util/00-mesa-defaults.conf
--- mesa-22.3.0-rc4/src/util/00-mesa-defaults.conf.dma 2022-11-25 10:32:32.175879868 +1000
+++ mesa-22.3.0-rc4/src/util/00-mesa-defaults.conf 2022-11-25 10:32:43.743067470 +1000
@@ -653,6 +653,7 @@
TODO: document the other workarounds.
<application name="gnome-shell" executable="gnome-shell">
<option name="adaptive_sync" value="false" />
<option name="v3d_nonmsaa_texture_size_limit" value="true" />
+ <option name="mesa_glthread" value="false"/>
</application>
<application name="Desktop — Plasma" executable="plasmashell">
<option name="adaptive_sync" value="false" />
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
SPECS/mesa.spec
0 → 100644
+
715
−
0
View file @
c8b02071
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment